Diskusia s redaktorom:Vasiľ: Rozdiel medzi revíziami

chýba zhrnutie úprav
(→‎Ill Bethisad: added some more)
::There is one more thing I'd like to add. Slovio is indeed an interesting case, very similar to this one. Please have a look at [[Diskusia:Slovio]], because it gives us an interesting case study. Indeed, it is boldly written: '''The deletion in the en wikipedia was a mistake''' and '''in addition, it was invented by a Slovak, therefore it is certainly relevant for this wikipedia'''. Therefore, the Slovio article was allowed to stay, in spite of the fact that the article '''contains no references or sources whatsoever'''. And believe me: although I personally dó think Slovio deserves an article, you won't find even half of the independent sources Ill Bethisad can produce.
::For that matter, I had a quick look at a few other articles about constructed languages. [[Esperanto]], [[Ido]], [[Interlingua]], [[Slovio]], [[Toki pona]], [[Glosolalia]], [[Quenijčina]], [[Volapük]], as well as quite a few other articles... none of these give even the slightest indication of notability! There are no sources, no references, external links only to self-published websites. Of course, bombing the Slovak wikipedia back into the Stone Age wouldn't be a good idea at all, and therefore I'm certainly not proposing deleting those. But I'm wondering why in the case of Ill Bethisad your demands are suddenly so extremely high - and all this based on the anonymous interference of a person who doesn't even give a proper explanation, but simply give a link to an old discussion at enwiki. [[Redaktor:IJzeren Jan|IJzeren Jan]] 00:02, 20. november 2009 (UTC)
Vasiľ, ja by som dal o tom prinajmenšom hlasovať. Osobne by som tu ten článok nechal, to len na angl. wiki je skupina
ľudí, ktorá je zásadne proti článkom o takýchto jazykoch (ja mám pocit, že to je zo závisti) a ako vždy tam urobia potom patričný krik, už sme ich tu aj párkrát mali. [[Redaktor:Bronto|Bronto]] 00:33, 20. november 2009 (UTC)
131 809