Prohlížení filtru zneužití 4: Nováček odstraňuje referenci

Prezeráte si starú verziu tohto filtra. Uvedené štatistiky sú pre aktuálnu verziu filtra. • Vrátiť sa na históriu tohto filtra.

Parametre filtra

ID filtra:	4
Popis: (verejne viditeľný)
Štatistika:	Z posledných 294 operácií tomuto filtru zodpovedali 2 (0,68 %). Priemerná doba jeho činnosti je 0,37 ms a potrebuje 4,1 podmienok z povoleného limitu.
Pravidlá:	!("autoconfirmed" in user_groups) /* this edit_delta ignores large blankings that are treated by another filter / & edit_delta >= -3000 & article_namespace == 0 / No added lines usually mean a blanking which is dealt with by other filter / & length(added_lines) != 0 & !("#redirect" in lcase(added_lines)) /Counts of more reference tags are removed than added / & (rcount("(<ref>\|<ref\s+(name\|group)\|</ref>)",removed_lines) > rcount("(<ref>\|<ref\s+(name\|group)\|</ref>)",added_lines)) /Excludes changing to the named reference format and removing closing tags attached to formerly named refs. Unequality is to account for closing the first named tag / & !(rcount("<ref>",removed_lines) = rcount("<ref\s+(name\|group)",added_lines) \| rcount("</ref>",removed_lines) <= rcount("<ref\s+(name\|group)",added_lines)) /Excludes removal of references to Wikipedia itself / & !(count("http://en.wikipedia.org",removed_lines) > count("http://en.wikipedia.org",added_lines)) !("autoconfirmed" in user_groups) / this edit_delta ignores large blankings that are treated by another filter / & edit_delta >= -3000 & article_namespace == 0 / No added lines usually mean a blanking which is dealt with by other filter / & length(added_lines) != 0 & !("#redirect" in lcase(added_lines)) /Counts of more reference tags are removed than added / & (rcount("(<ref>\|<ref\s+(name\|group)\|</ref>)",removed_lines) > rcount("(<ref>\|<ref\s+(name\|group)\|</ref>)",added_lines)) /Excludes changing to the named reference format and removing closing tags attached to formerly named refs. Unequality is to account for closing the first named tag / & !(rcount("<ref>",removed_lines) = rcount("<ref\s+(name\|group)",added_lines) \| rcount("</ref>",removed_lines) <= rcount("<ref\s+(name\|group)",added_lines)) /Excludes removal of references to Wikipedia itself */ & !(count("http://en.wikipedia.org",removed_lines) > count("http://en.wikipedia.org",added_lines))
Poznámky:	Tchoř importoval z en: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:AbuseFilter/61 ------- "<ref\|</ref" split for clarity Appears to get more and better hits on referenced info now too. Apparently, previous version wasn't working properly. --Mgm Switched on. - It Is Me Here Tagging instead of disallowing, there are plenty of good reasons to remove references. -- Mgm Oh, is this for all references? Wasn't there one regarding removing a {{Reflist}} template? - It Is Me Here That one (filter 79) was a test, and it doesn't appear to be working properly. It hasn't caught anything for at least 24 hours. - Mgm removed private flag, unnecessary -- Zzuuzz Updated format that should also catch named references and avoid the old reference grouping tag. --Mgm Filter 79 now working properly, removing line that specifies reflist. Working on better regex to avoid <references/> being hit with this one --Mgm Changing to edit_delta <= -1000 from >= -1000; seems like this was the intent. >= and <= comparisons are based on actual value, not absolute value. Correct me if this was the intent. Also, we are getting some false positives on this, see http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Interstate_5_in_Washington&diff=279452062&oldid=278504317 - Hersfold >= is correct. It is supposed to exclude large removals from being evaluated since they're covered by blanking filters. It was an error in the regex. Instead of allowing for <ref name="whatever">, the regex allowed choosing between <ref> and <ref name>, the last of which obviously didn't work. -- Mgm added note in filter to avoid confusion --Mgm Altered regex to treat refs as whole blocks, to avoid situation where a duplicate ref is changed to a named ref (<ref>Blah</ref> --> <ref name=foo/>). Now won't catch users removing one end of a ref though. Might have ec'd with cmt above, but can't tell in this wierd system :D --HM Okay... I THINK this is finally a correct regex that: 1) grabs <ref> ... </ref> as entire blocks 2) grabs <ref name="foo"/> 3) ignores <references/> 4) allows newline breaks between <ref> and </ref> tags. 5) grabs only consecutive <ref>, </ref> pairs (as opposed to jumping from the first <ref> to the last </ref>). -DF Restored original version, added exclusions for naming references and removing closing tags of named references. --Mgm Added comments for clarity --Mgm Too many false positives, setting to log only. --Conti From Coppertwig: A more exact count might be obtained by defining a ref-opening as either "<ref>" or "<ref name" and a ref-closing as either "</ref>" or "ref name ... />". (With the named reference, the same tag will sometimes count as both an opening and a closing.) The code might look something like this (assuming rcount expects regular expressions): /* count of removed ref-openings exceeds count of added ref-openings, or count of removed ref-closings exceeds count of added ref-closings; named refs with slashes count as both openings and closings. / & (rcount("(<ref>\|<ref\sname)",removed_lines) > rcount("(<ref>\|<ref\sname)",added_lines) \| rcount("(</ref>\|<ref\sname[^>/]/>)",removed_lines) > rcount("(</ref>\|<ref\sname[^>/]*/>)",added_lines) Adjusted delta to -3000 due to a sock removing references that has been missed due to the total removed content. Ref [[User:Ryulong/Sandbox#Ref_removing_vandal]] - Shirik 24 Jan I replaced \sname with \s(name\|group). - Ruslik Something 'wrong' here .. it catches also '<ref></ref>' (i.e., empty tags, as included in the article creation wizard). They should be excluded.
Príznaky:	Skryť verejné zobrazovanie podrobností filtra Zapnúť tento filter Označiť ako zmazané
Posledná zmena filtra:	21:11, 29. august 2011, Mercy (diskusia \| príspevky)
História:	Zobraziť históriu tohto filtra
Nástroje:	Exportovať tento filter do inej wiki {"data":{"rules":"!(\"autoconfirmed\" in user_groups)\r\n/* this edit_delta ignores large blankings that are treated by another filter /\r\n\u0026 edit_delta \u003E= -3000\r\n\u0026 article_namespace == 0\r\n/ No added lines usually mean a blanking which is dealt with by other filter /\r\n\u0026 length(added_lines) != 0\r\n\u0026 !(\"#redirect\" in lcase(added_lines))\r\n/Counts of more reference tags are removed than added /\r\n\u0026 (rcount(\"(\u003Cref\u003E\|\u003Cref\\s+(name\|group)\|\u003C/ref\u003E)\",removed_lines) \u003E rcount(\"(\u003Cref\u003E\|\u003Cref\\s+(name\|group)\|\u003C/ref\u003E)\",added_lines))\r\n/Excludes changing to the named reference format and removing closing tags attached to formerly named refs. Unequality is to account for closing the first named tag /\r\n\u0026 !(rcount(\"\u003Cref\u003E\",removed_lines) = rcount(\"\u003Cref\\s+(name\|group)\",added_lines) \| rcount(\"\u003C/ref\u003E\",removed_lines) \u003C= rcount(\"\u003Cref\\s+(name\|group)\",added_lines))\r\n/Excludes removal of references to Wikipedia itself /\r\n\u0026 !(count(\"http://en.wikipedia.org\",removed_lines) \u003E count(\"http://en.wikipedia.org\",added_lines))","name":"Nov\u00e1\u010dek odstra\u0148uje referenci","comments":"Tcho\u0159 importoval z en: \r\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:AbuseFilter/61\r\n-------\r\n\"\u003Cref\|\u003C/ref\" split for clarity\r\n\r\nAppears to get more and better hits on referenced info now too. Apparently, previous version wasn't working properly. --Mgm\r\n\r\nSwitched on. - It Is Me Here\r\nTagging instead of disallowing, there are plenty of good reasons to remove references. -- Mgm\r\nOh, is this for all references? Wasn't there one regarding removing a {{Reflist}} template? - It Is Me Here\r\n That one (filter 79) was a test, and it doesn't appear to be working properly. It hasn't caught anything for at least 24 hours. - Mgm\r\nremoved private flag, unnecessary -- Zzuuzz\r\nUpdated format that should also catch named references and avoid the old reference grouping tag. --Mgm\r\nFilter 79 now working properly, removing line that specifies reflist. Working on better regex to avoid \u003Creferences/\u003E being hit with this one --Mgm\r\n\r\nChanging to edit_delta \u003C= -1000 from \u003E= -1000; seems like this was the intent. \u003E= and \u003C= comparisons are based on actual value, not absolute value. Correct me if this was the intent. Also, we are getting some false positives on this, see http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Interstate_5_in_Washington\u0026diff=279452062\u0026oldid=278504317 - Hersfold\r\n\r\n\u003E= is correct. It is supposed to exclude large removals from being evaluated since they're covered by blanking filters. It was an error in the regex. Instead of allowing for \u003Cref name=\"whatever\"\u003E, the regex allowed choosing between \u003Cref\u003E and \u003Cref name\u003E, the last of which obviously didn't work. -- Mgm\r\n\r\nadded note in filter to avoid confusion --Mgm\r\n\r\nAltered regex to treat refs as whole blocks, to avoid situation where a duplicate ref is changed to a named ref (\u003Cref\u003EBlah\u003C/ref\u003E --\u003E \u003Cref name=foo/\u003E). Now won't catch users removing one end of a ref though. Might have ec'd with cmt above, but can't tell in this wierd system :D --HM\r\n\r\n\r\nOkay... I THINK this is finally a correct regex that:\r\n\r\n 1) grabs \u003Cref\u003E ... \u003C/ref\u003E as entire blocks\r\n 2) grabs \u003Cref name=\"foo\"/\u003E\r\n 3) ignores \u003Creferences/\u003E\r\n 4) allows newline breaks between \u003Cref\u003E and \u003C/ref\u003E tags.\r\n 5) grabs only consecutive \u003Cref\u003E, \u003C/ref\u003E pairs (as opposed to jumping from the first \u003Cref\u003E to the last \u003C/ref\u003E).\r\n\r\n-DF\r\n\r\nRestored original version, added exclusions for naming references and removing closing tags of named references. --Mgm\r\n\r\nAdded comments for clarity --Mgm\r\n\r\nToo many false positives, setting to log only. --Conti\r\n\r\nFrom Coppertwig:\r\nA more exact count might be obtained by defining a ref-opening as either \"\u003Cref\u003E\" or \"\u003Cref name\" and a ref-closing as either \"\u003C/ref\u003E\" or \"ref name ... /\u003E\". (With the named reference, the same tag will sometimes count as both an opening and a closing.) The code might look something like this (assuming rcount expects regular expressions):\r\n\r\n/ count of removed ref-openings exceeds count of added ref-openings, or count of removed ref-closings exceeds count of added ref-closings; named refs with slashes count as both openings and closings. / \u0026 (rcount(\"(\u003Cref\u003E\|\u003Cref\\sname)\",removed_lines) \u003E rcount(\"(\u003Cref\u003E\|\u003Cref\\sname)\",added_lines) \| rcount(\"(\u003C/ref\u003E\|\u003Cref\\sname[^\u003E/]/\u003E)\",removed_lines) \u003E rcount(\"(\u003C/ref\u003E\|\u003Cref\\sname[^\u003E/]*/\u003E)\",added_lines)\r\n\r\nAdjusted delta to -3000 due to a sock removing references that has been missed due to the total removed content. Ref [[User:Ryulong/Sandbox#Ref_removing_vandal]] - Shirik 24 Jan\r\n\r\nI replaced \\sname with \\s(name\|group). - Ruslik\r\n\r\nSomething 'wrong' here .. it catches also '\u003Cref\u003E\u003C/ref\u003E' (i.e., empty tags, as included in the article creation wizard). They should be excluded.","group":"default","actions":{"tag":["odstr\u00e1nenie referencie"]},"enabled":true,"deleted":false,"privacylevel":0,"global":false},"actions":{"tag":["odstr\u00e1nenie referencie"]}}

Opatrenia vykonané pri zásahu

Spustiť operáciu len ak používateľ dosiahne limit rýchlosti úprav

Počet povolených operácií:

Časový interval (v sekundách):

Obmedzenie rýchlosti úprav skupiny:

user

Viď dokumentáciu na mediawiki.org.

Spustiť tieto operácie po varovaní používateľa

Systémová správa použitá pri upozornení:

Názov stránky inej správy:

(bez predpony „MediaWiki:“)

Zamietnuť používateľovi vykonať operáciu

Systémová správa použitá pri hatení:

Názov stránky inej správy:

(bez predpony „MediaWiki:“)

Odobrať používateľovi stav „zaregistrovaný”

Označiť úpravu na ďalšiu kontrolu.

Značky, ktoré sa majú pridať:

odstránenie referencie

Require the user to complete a CAPTCHA in order to proceed with the action. Users with permission to skip a CAPTCHA are exempt.

Prezeráte si starú verziu tohto filtra. Uvedené štatistiky sú pre aktuálnu verziu filtra. • Vrátiť sa na históriu tohto filtra.